[Primary biliary cholangitis-response criteria of first-line treatment and perspectives of second-line therapy]. / Primär biliäre Cholangitis ­ Response-Kriterien der Erstlinientherapie und Perspektiven der Zweitlinientherapie.

BACKGROUND: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease that can progress to liver cirrhosis if left untreated. Early diagnosis, initiation of therapy and, if necessary, adjustment of treatment are essential to prevent disease progression. The timing and thresholds for assessing adequate treatment response are inconsistently defined in the literature and can pose a challenge in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: In addition to providing a concise overview of the guideline-based diagnostic work-up and first-line therapy, this study offers practical guidance for the evaluation of treatment response and options for second-line treatment in PBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article is based on the current European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) clinical practice guidelines for the management of PBC from 2017 as well as a literature review of studies from 2017 to 2023, focusing on defining treatment response, assessing disease progression risk, and the approved and investigational agents for second-line therapy. RESULTS: There are varying definitions for a sufficient response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Therapeutic goals are tailored to the individual risk of disease progression. The lowest risk appears to be associated with normalization of alkaline phosphatase (AP) and serum bilirubin below 0.6 the upper limit of normal. Established second-line therapies include obeticholic acid and bezafibrate (off-label use), while other peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists and combination therapies are under clinical investigation. DISCUSSION: Early evaluation of treatment response to UDCA is mandatory. In the case of insufficient treatment response, second-line therapy should be initiated according to the individual's risk profile.

Accuracy of controlled attenuation parameter measurement for the detection of steatosis in autoimmune liver diseases.

Background & Aims: Concurrent fatty liver disease represents an emerging challenge in the care of individuals with autoimmune liver diseases (AILD). Therefore, we aimed to validate the ultrasound-based method of controlled-attenuation parameter (CAP) as a non-invasive tool to detect hepatic steatosis in individuals with AILD. Methods: The diagnostic performance of CAP to determine biopsy-proven hepatic steatosis (>5%) was assessed in individuals with AILD (autoimmune hepatitis [AIH], primary biliary cholangitis [PBC], primary biliary cholangitis [PSC], or variant syndromes) who underwent liver biopsy at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 2015-2020 by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. In AIH, the impact of disease activity was evaluated by assessment of CAP upon resolution of hepatic inflammation during follow-up. Results: Overall, 433 individuals with AILD (AIH: 218, PBC: 51, PSC: 85, PBC/AIH: 63, PSC/AIH: 16) were included. Histologically proven steatosis was present in 90 individuals (20.8%). Steatosis was less frequently observed in people with PSC (14%) than in other AILD. CAP values correlated positively with grade of steatosis (ρ = 0.39) and the BMI (ρ = 0.53). In PBC and PSC, the ROC curves defined an AUROC of 0.81 and 0.93 for detecting steatosis at an optimal cut-off of 276 dB/m (sensitivity: 0.71; specificity: 0.82) and 254 dB/m (sensitivity: 0.91, specificity: 0.85), respectively. In AIH, the diagnostic performance of CAP was significantly lower (AUROC = 0.72, p = 0.009). However, resolution of hepatic inflammation under treatment was associated with a significant increase in CAP levels (median [IQR]: +38.0 [6-81] dB/m) and considerably improved diagnostic accuracy (AUROC = 0.85; cut-off: 288 dB/m; sensitivity: 0.67, specificity: 0.90). Conclusions: In PBC and PSC, hepatic steatosis can be reliably detected by applying disease-specific thresholds of CAP. In AIH, the diagnostic accuracy of CAP is moderate at diagnosis, but improves after acute hepatitis has resolved. Impact and implications: Non-invasive estimation of fat content in the liver can be performed with the ultrasound-based method of controlled-attenuation parameter (CAP). Here, we showed that the presence of a concomitant fatty liver is frequent in people with autoimmune liver diseases and we determined disease-specific thresholds of CAP to best predict the presence of a fatty liver. CAP measurement was shown to be a valid tool to detect fatty liver in individuals with PSC and PBC; however, in AIH, CAP had limited accuracy especially when significant inflammatory activity was present in the liver. In the context of substantial liver inflammation, therefore, CAP values should be interpreted with caution, and measurements should be repeated after acute hepatitis has resolved.

Hepatic safety and efficacy of immunomodulatory drugs used in patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is little data on the hepatic efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory drugs used in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), despite their established use in dermatology, rheumatology and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Our aim was to collect real-life data on the experience of expert centres in treating AIH patients with these drugs, considered unconventional for AIH management. METHODS: Online survey among hepatology centres being part of the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER). RESULTS: 25 AIH patients have been reported. Ten were female, median age at diagnosis was 28 years; median follow-up was 17 months. All had initially received AIH-standard treatment. AIH-unconventional treatment was initiated for concomitant autoimmune diseases in 15 cases: nine for IBD (five vedolizumab and four ustekinumab), and one each for following diseases: autoinflammatory syndrome (tocilizumab), chronic urticaria (omalizumab), rheumatoid arthritis (abatacept), psoriasis (guselkumab), psoriatric arthritis (secukinumab, followed by ustekinumab) and alopecia (ruxolitinib). Three patients were treated with immunomodulatory drugs for side effects of previous treatments, including two patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab, respectively, and one treated with belimumab. At the end of follow-up, 13 patients were in complete biochemical response, the patient on omalizumab had a relapse, and four patients with concomitant IBD had insufficient response. Seven patients were treated for lack of biochemical remission, of whom six with belimumab, all initially reaching complete biochemical response, but five relapsing during follow-up; and one with secukinumab, having concomitant rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, reaching complete biochemical response. Only the patient on abatacept received unconventional treatment as monotherapy. Side effects were reported in two patients on belimumab: one recurrent soft tissue infections, one fatigue and arthralgia. CONCLUSION: Among 25 AIH patients who were treated with immunomodulatory drugs for different reasons, the majority had a fovorable course, relapse was frequent in difficult-to-treat patients who received belimumab, and four with concomitant IBD had insufficient response.

Immune signatures in variant syndromes of primary biliary cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Variant syndromes of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) share diagnostic features of both entities, but their immunological underpinnings remain largely unexplored. METHODS: We performed blood profiling of 23 soluble immune markers and immunogenetics in a cohort of 88 patients with autoimmune liver diseases (29 typical AIH, 31 typical PBC and 28 with clinically PBC/AIH variant syndromes). The association with demographical, serological and clinical features was analyzed. RESULTS: While T and B cell receptor repertoires were highly skewed in variant syndromes compared to healthy controls, these biases were not sufficiently discriminated within the spectrum of autoimmune liver diseases. High circulating checkpoint molecules sCD25, sLAG-3, sCD86 and sTim-3 discriminated AIH from PBC on top of classical parameters such as transaminases and immunoglobulin levels. In addition, a second cluster of correlated soluble immune factors encompassing essentially TNF, IFNγ, IL12p70, sCTLA-4, sPD-1 and sPD-L1 appeared characteristic of AIH. Cases with complete biochemical responses to treatment generally showed a lower level of dysregulation. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of classical and variant syndromes identified two pathological immunotypes consisting predominantly of either AIH or PBC cases. Variant syndromes did not form a separate group, but clustered together with either classical AIH or PBC. Clinically, patient with AIH-like variant syndromes were less likely to be able discontinue immunosuppressive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses suggest that variants of immune mediated liver diseases may represent an immunological spectrum from PBC to AIH-like disease reflected by their pattern of soluble immune checkpoint molecules rather than separate entities.

Analysis of the humoral and cellular response after the third COVID-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To explore the humoral and T-cell response to the third COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). METHODS: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers were prospectively determined in 81 AIH patients and 53 healthy age- and sex-matched controls >7 days (median 35) after the first COVID-19 booster vaccination. The spike-specific T-cell response was assessed using an activation-induced marker assay (AIM) in a subset of patients. RESULTS: Median antibody levels were significantly lower in AIH compared to controls (10 908 vs. 25 000 AU/ml, p < .001), especially in AIH patients treated with MMF (N = 14, 4542 AU/ml, p = .004) or steroids (N = 27, 7326 AU/ml, p = .020). Also, 48% of AIH patients had antibody titers below the 10% percentile of the healthy controls (9194 AU/ml, p < .001). AIH patients had a high risk of failing to develop a spike-specific T-cell response (15/34 (44%) vs. 2/16 (12%), p = .05) and showed overall lower frequencies of spike-specific CD4 + T cells (median: 0.074% vs 0.283; p = .01) after the booster vaccination compared to healthy individuals. In 34/81 patients, antibody titers before and after booster vaccination were available. In this subgroup, all patients but especially those without detectable/low antibodies titers (<100 AU/ml) after the second vaccination (N = 11/34) showed a strong, 148-fold increase. CONCLUSION: A third COVID-19 vaccination efficiently boosts antibody levels and T-cell responses in AIH patients and even seroconversion in patients with the absent immune response after two vaccinations, but to a lower level compared to controls. Therefore, we suggest routinely assessing antibody levels in AIH patients and offering additional booster vaccinations to those with suboptimal responses.

Inflammatory type 2 conventional dendritic cells contribute to murine and human cholangitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a progressive cholangiopathy characterised by fibrotic stricturing and inflammation of bile ducts, which seems to be driven by a maladaptive immune response to bile duct injury. The histological finding of dendritic cell expansion in portal fields of patients with PSC prompted us to investigate the role of dendritic cells in orchestrating the immune response to bile duct injury. METHODS: Dendritic cell numbers and subtypes were determined in different mouse models of cholangitis by flow cytometry based on lineage-imprinted markers. Findings were confirmed by immunofluorescence microscopy of murine livers, and liver samples from patients with PSC were compared to control samples from bariatric surgery patients. Using genetic tools, selected dendritic cell subsets were depleted in murine cholangitis. The dendritic cell response to bile duct injury was determined by single-cell transcriptomics. RESULTS: Cholangitis mouse models were characterised by selective intrahepatic expansion of type 2 conventional dendritic cells, whereas plasmacytoid and type 1 conventional dendritic cells were not expanded. Expansion of type 2 conventional dendritic cells in human PSC lesions was confirmed by histology. Depletion studies revealed a proinflammatory role of type 2 conventional dendritic cells. Single-cell transcriptomics confirmed inflammatory maturation of the intrahepatic type 2 conventional dendritic cells and identified dendritic cell-derived inflammatory mediators. CONCLUSIONS: Cholangitis is characterised by intrahepatic expansion and inflammatory maturation of type 2 conventional dendritic cells in response to biliary injury. Therefore, type 2 conventional dendritic cells and their inflammatory mediators might be potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of PSC. LAY SUMMARY: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is an inflammatory liver disease of the bile ducts for which there is no effective treatment. Herein, we show that the inflammatory immune response to bile duct injury is organised by a specific subtype of immune cell called conventional type 2 dendritic cells. Our findings suggest that this cell subtype and the inflammatory molecules it produces are potential therapeutic targets for PSC.

B cells in autoimmune hepatitis: bystanders or central players?

B cells are central for the adaptive immune system to mount successful immune responses not only as antibody producers but also as regulators of cellular immunity. These multifaceted features are also reflected in autoimmunity where autoreactive B cells can fuel disease by production of cytotoxic autoantibodies, presentation of autoantigens to autoreactive T cells, and secretion of cytokines and chemokines that either promote detrimental immune activation or impair regulatory T and B cells. The role of B cells and autoantibodies in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) have been controversially discussed, with typical autoantibodies and hypergammaglobulinemia indicating a key role, while strong HLA class II association suggests T cells as key players. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on B cells in AIH and how different B cell subpopulations may drive AIH progression beyond autoantibodies. We also discuss recent findings of B cell-directed therapies in AIH.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination response in patients with autoimmune hepatitis and autoimmune cholestatic liver disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In this observational study, we explored the humoral and cellular immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and patients with cholestatic autoimmune liver disease (primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC] and primary biliary cholangitis [PBC]). METHODS: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers were determined using the DiaSorin LIAISON and Roche immunoassays in 103 AIH, 64 PSC, and 61 PBC patients and 95 healthy controls >14 days after the second COVID-19 vaccination. The spike-specific T-cell response was assessed using an activation-induced marker assay (AIM) in a subset of individuals. RESULTS: Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was frequently detected in AIH but not in PBC/PSC (10/112 (9%), versus 4/144 (2.7%), p = 0.03). In the remaining patients, seroconversion was measurable in 97% of AIH and 99% of PBC/PSC patients, respectively. However, in 13/94 AIH patients antibody levels were lower than in any healthy control, which contributed to lower antibody levels of the total AIH cohort when compared to PBC/PSC or controls (641 vs. 1020 vs. 1200 BAU/ml, respectively). Notably, antibody levels were comparably low in AIH patients with (n = 85) and without immunosuppression (n = 9). Also, antibody titers significantly declined within 7 months after the second vaccination. In the AIM assay of 20 AIH patients, a spike-specific T-cell response was undetectable in 45% despite a positive serology, while 87% (13/15) of the PBC/PSC demonstrated a spike-specific T-cell response. CONCLUSION: Patients with AIH show an increased SARS-CoV-2 infection rate as well as an impaired B- and T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine compared to PBC and PSC patients, even in the absence of immunosuppression. Thus, antibody responses to vaccination in AIH patients need to be monitored and early booster immunizations considered in low responders.

Hepatic ILC2 activity is regulated by liver inflammation-induced cytokines and effector CD4+ T cells.

In immune-mediated hepatitis, type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) as well as effector CD4+ T cells have been shown to drive disease pathology. However, less is known about mechanisms involved in the regulation of ILC2 function during liver inflammation. We showed that in homeostasis, hepatic ILC2 constituted a very small population with a naive, inactive phenotype. During immune-mediated hepatitis, the cytokines IL-33 and IFNγ were expressed in liver tissue. IL-33 induced strong activation and expression of type 2 cytokines as well as IL-6 by hepatic ILC2 while IFNγ suppressed cytokine production. Interestingly, this inhibitory effect was overcome by IL-33. The phenotype of activated hepatic ILC2 were stable since they did not show functional plasticity in response to liver inflammation-induced cytokines. Moreover, hepatic ILC2 induced a Th2 phenotype in activated CD4+ T cells, which increased ILC2-derived cytokine expression via IL-2. In contrast, Th1 cells inhibited survival of ILC2 by production of IFNγ. Thus, hepatic ILC2 function is regulated by IL-33, IL-2, and IFNγ. While IL-33 and IL-2 support hepatic ILC2 activation, their inflammatory activity in immune-mediated hepatitis might be limited by infiltrating IFNγ-expressing Th1 cells.

A Proinflammatory Role of Type 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells in Murine Immune-Mediated Hepatitis.

Type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) mediate inflammatory immune responses in the context of diseases triggered by the alarmin IL-33. In recent years, IL-33 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated liver diseases. However, the immunoregulatory function of ILC2s in the inflamed liver remains elusive. Using the murine model of Con A-induced immune-mediated hepatitis, we showed that selective expansion of ILC2s in the liver was associated with highly elevated hepatic IL-33 expression, severe liver inflammation, and infiltration of eosinophils. CD4+ T cell-mediated tissue damage and subsequent IL-33 release were responsible for the activation of hepatic ILC2s that produced the type 2 cytokines IL-5 and IL-13 during liver inflammation. Interestingly, ILC2 depletion correlated with less severe hepatitis and reduced accumulation of eosinophils in the liver, whereas adoptive transfer of hepatic ILC2s aggravated liver inflammation and tissue damage. We further showed that, despite expansion of hepatic ILC2s, 3-d IL-33 treatment before Con A challenge potently suppressed development of immune-mediated hepatitis. We found that IL-33 not only activated hepatic ILC2s but also expanded CD4+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) expressing the IL-33 receptor ST2 in the liver. This Treg subset also accumulated in the liver during resolution of immune-mediated hepatitis. In summary, hepatic ILC2s are poised to respond to the release of IL-33 upon liver tissue damage through expression of type 2 cytokines thereby participating in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated hepatitis. Inflammatory activity of ILC2s might be regulated by IL-33-elicited ST2+ Tregs that also arise in immune-mediated hepatitis.